Forgiving in Silence

I forgive people in silence, long before they ask — or deserve it.
I especially forgive those who never ask, and who will never be part of my life again.

I am no saint. I have my own shadows — moments of regret, lack of skill, and choices that reveal my humanity rather than my virtue.

My reason for forgiving is not altruism, nor does it come from some exceptional empathy for the imperfections of others. I forgive because I do not like the weight of not forgiving. I do not like how it occupies my mind, or tightens the space between my breasts. It is a heavy way to breathe, day after day.

So I forgive quietly, and I move on. I let experiences transform into insight, into learning. I allow my heart to navigate the process, and I can almost feel my thoughts forming new synapses as I do.

It is not painless. Forgiveness often requires meeting grief, fear, insecurity, and loss — without rushing past them.

But on the other side of that work is something I value deeply: the ability to live lightly, and in the light of growth.

I have learned that committing to how I want to experience life — rather than reacting to how life happens — is the most satisfying way for me to live.

I hope, with my whole heart, that I will always return to this place.

~ Evgenia Pimżin

Ethical Love and the Courage to Choose Restraint

Love.
What is love?

We all need it, feel it, are inspired by it, and in many instances, make choices directly because of love.

Love, grammatically speaking, is function-flexible.

As a noun, love is patient.
As a verb, perhaps the most familiar expression: I love you.
It can also act as a gerund (a verb acting as a noun): loving takes courage.

In many ways, love imitates art — and in this context, grammar — it is as complex as its usage.

And the most complex form of all is ethical love.

Ethical love is care that never overrides another person’s autonomy, dignity, or consent — regardless of closeness, affection, or responsibility.
It is love governed by respect, not entitlement.

Ethical love is the practice of caring for someone without claiming ownership over their inner world, their choices, or their becoming.

It does not ask, “Do I love you?”
It asks, “Am I loving you in a way that preserves who you are?”

Ethical love requires that we see each person through the lens of their humanity.

Because behind every person — whether we know them or not — is their history: lived experience, internal narratives, beliefs, and a worldview shaped over time.

And almost none of that is visible.

We may make assumptions based on clothing, skin colour, energy, or expressed views — but these are, at best, guestimates.

The deeper truths are simpler.

We have far more in common than what divides us.
We all want to be loved, to feel safe, to have access to medical care, secure housing, and the ability to feed ourselves and those we love.

A necessary caveat: these reflections exclude situations where abuse or clearly toxic behaviour endangers another person.

So how does ethical love behave when it feels threatened?

This is where the difference between love and ethical love becomes clear.

Ethical love behaves very differently from anxious or possessive love when under threat.
The difference is restraint, not withdrawal.

Ethical love pauses before acting. When fear, jealousy, or the possibility of loss arises, it notices the threat internally and allows the emotion to register — but it resists impulsive action, understanding that emotion is information, not instruction.

This distinction matters.

Feeling threatened is real. But when threat is processed as information and met with restraint, it opens space for choice.

Even then, ethical love continues to honour another person’s sovereignty — their right to autonomy.

At its core, ethical love operates from a simple internal truth:
“I am afraid — but fear does not give me rights.”

This is crucial.

No matter how threatened we feel, ethical love refuses to interrogate, invade, or control. Instead, it contains fear in order to seek clarity, understanding, honest dialogue, and internal grounding — rather than compliance.

Ethical love invites truth.
It does not demand reassurance.

This is the crux of ethical love: it makes room for the possibility of loss.

The hardest aspect of love is the willingness to risk distance, tolerate uncertainty, survive misunderstanding, and endure grief if necessary.

Why would ethical love allow for the possibility of loss?

Because it does not trade dignity for security.
It does not collapse into self-erasure.
It does not escalate into domination.
It does not manipulate emotionally.
It does not moralise fear (“If you loved me, you would…”).
It does not confuse urgency with intimacy.

These are threat responses — not love.

When we operate from ethical love, especially under threat, the body may feel tense but grounded; alert, not panicked; sorrowful rather than frantic; restrained rather than urgent.

There is pain — but not chaos.

When I began operating from a place of restraint, I was finally able to face a lifetime of grief. In that space, I was able to process it.

Only through processed grief can I now sense whether I am acting from ethical love — or from grief itself.

Unprocessed grief, more often than not, sits at the centre of how we navigate situations where we feel emotionally threatened.

And perhaps this is the quiet truth:

Love does not become ethical by how intensely we feel, but by how carefully we behave when we are afraid.

Ethical love is not the absence of fear.
It is the refusal to let fear decide who we become.

~ Evgenia Pimżin